The Human Rights Act: How it Changed British Politics and Law Forever



The Human Rights Act was a landmark legislation passed in the United Kingdom in 1998, incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into British law. This Act of parliament changed British politics and law forever by placing human rights at the heart of the legal system, providing more excellent protection for citizens from abuses of state power, and creating a powerful legal tool for challenging injustices. This article will explore the history and significance of the Human Rights Act and examine its impact on British politics and law.

The History of the Human Rights Act

The origins of the Human Rights Act can be traced to the aftermath of World War II when the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. The Declaration established fundamental human rights that all member states should uphold, including the right to life, liberty and security of person, freedom of speech and assembly, and the right to fair trials. However, these rights were not legally binding and depended on the goodwill of individual governments to be enforced.

In response to this situation, the Council of Europe drafted the European Convention on Human Rights in 1950, which established an international legal framework for protecting human rights across Europe. The Convention became legally binding when countries signed and ratified it, acknowledging that they would respect the rights and freedoms listed in the document. The Convention created the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which had the power to hear cases from citizens who claimed that their government violated their human rights.

While the UK was one of the countries involved in drafting the ECHR, it was not until 1966 that it signed the Convention. It took another 32 years for the Human Rights Act to be passed, with the parliament eventually recognizing the need for the Convention to be integrated into British law.

The Significance of the Human Rights Act

The Human Rights Act represented a significant shift in how British law was practiced. Previously, human rights had not been a central feature of the legal system but rather something dealt with on an ad-hoc basis. The Human Rights Act established a legal framework that protected and promoted humanitarian rights at the heart of the legal system.

ALSO READ  Tycoon Anthoni Salim’s First Pacific, Partners Spending $992 Million To Take Philippine Infra Firm Private

The Act had several key features that made it so significant. Firstly, it incorporated the ECHR into British law, making it legally binding for public authorities to respect and protect the rights and freedoms outlined in the Convention. This allowed citizens to challenge any breaches of their human rights by the state and paved the way for creating the Equality Act in 2010, which prohibits discrimination on the grounds of specific characteristics.

Secondly, the Act introduced the “margin of appreciation” concept to British law. This concept recognizes that different countries have different cultural, social, and historical contexts, and therefore, it provides a degree of flexibility to how the ECHR is implemented in each country. In other words, it allows judges to consider each case’s particular circumstances when applying social rights legislation.

Thirdly, the Act established the role of the Lord Chancellor in ensuring that legislation introduced by the government complied with the ECHR. This meant that the government had to consider human rights when drafting new laws, ensuring that they were compatible with the Convention.

Fourthly, the Act introduced the possibility of declaring legislation incompatible with human rights, which gave judges the power to apply a “declaration of incompatibility” to the law if it violated the ECHR. While this did not invalidate the legislation, it brought attention to the bill’s problematic aspects and put pressure on the government to address these issues.

The Impact of the Human Rights Act

Since its adoption, the Human Rights Act has shaped British politics and legislation. First, the Act empowers individuals to challenge governmental power abuses and provides a significant legal weapon to hold the government responsible. This has increased transparency and accountability in government decision-making and revealed many fundamental rights infractions that may have gone undiscovered. Second, the Act promoted British social justice and equality. The Act has improved society by outlawing discrimination based on race, gender, sexuality, and handicap. Third, the Act has changed how the government writes laws. The government must consider human rights while creating policy since any legislation must comply with the ECHR. This has led to a more rights-based approach to policy-making, which has helped the government comply with international human rights norms. Finally, it aligned the UK with other European countries, improving European legal consistency. This has enhanced international collaboration and preserved citizens’ rights.

ALSO READ  Ukraine War Updates: Russia Launches Overnight Attacks on Odesa


The Human Rights Act has played a pivotal role in shaping British politics and law for over 20 years. The Act has placed human rights at the heart of the legal system, providing more excellent protection for citizens from abuses of state power and creating a powerful legal tool for challenging injustices. In addition, the Act has helped promote social justice and equality, has significantly impacted how government legislation is drafted, and has brought the UK into line with other European countries. Overall, the Human Rights Act has been a critical step forward in promoting human rights and civil liberties in Britain, and its legacy continues to be felt today.
The Human Rights Act\’s Effect on British Politics and Law


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *